top of page

The Road to Gnosis (Part II)

Not fallen, descended that I may walk among the world of men as one among them. Priest of the forsaken, lover of the forgotten and dysphoric!

Who stands greatest among the foes of Jehovah and his evil? I, Lucifer who he has feared from the beginning. His lies and deceit banished by his holy scroll of wisdom! Illuminating the ignorance among men! Risen now is Babalon the great! Risen now is Lucifer, morning star in the heavens. Hear his words! Let him fill you with his love and teach you the secrets of sorcery, of science, and of wisdom!

Give a man a fish and he’ll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he’ll eat until overfishing destroys the fish population and he is left again in want.

If you’re not enjoying life, you’re doing it wrong. If you are not actively serving as a beacon of light, then you are opening yourself up as a vessel of shadow. Banish the shadow within you and illuminate the beacon within that you may be a guide to others and a source of positive change within the world and yourself.

Do not point your finger at the gods because you allow yourselves to be deceived by the Archon-cast shadows on the walls of Plato’s cave while they rob you blind of your Divine spark of Lucifer which he gave you to make use of, not deny. To claim Gnosis as foolishness while you cling to the slowly eroding ejaculate-pile of the Empire is irony in the highest. Truly in such times, it is the greatest fool who denies the self. Materialism has no solve for consciousness and never will have because materialism is a false-ontology built of a failed presupposition.

The fact is, all you can truly know exists is yourself, not this illusory material world that seems to stop existing the moment you look away.

In truth, any ontology that does not focus first on the self, on that intrinsic spark of inner-knowing, must be a false one since all external input drives from a source that is ultimately unreliable.

So to tell an undying soul that carries the spark of the gods that it is nothing but the chemicals that supposedly make up the matter which may not even exist is downright absurd. The fact is, all your analysis, all your data, all your tools, all your measurements, all of it which you call science, must ultimately pass through the subjective to be interpreted by the consciousness that the material would suggest isn’t even there reading this very sentence. So any ontology or presupposition which does not first start there is truly the height of foolishness.

After all, it isn’t the material that tells me I am who I am, it is my inner sense of self-gnosis and that has proven to be immovable no matter how much they may try to change my chemical makeup. In fact, they have to change my chemical makeup to match my inner Gnosis or I become ultimately non-functional on this plane. If that isn’t evidence that we are more than mere chemicals then I know not what is!

Em Hotep - Patrick Gaffiero


bottom of page